At a time when many of us may feel like we’re being systematically shafted by big business and powerful financial institutions, it’s natural that some of us might feel justified in seeking retribution against them for their deceitful actions. Such was also the case in February 1977, when an aggrieved borrower sought potentially deadly vengeance against the president of an Indianapolis mortgage company, as seen in this fact-based comedy-drama-thriller from director Gus Van Sant. When Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgård), a mentally challenged borrower, felt financially betrayed by a lender he implicitly trusted, he decided to take action to get back at the loan company’s owner, M.L. Hall (Al Pacino). However, on the day he was scheduled to meet with Mr. Hall, Kiritsis learned that he was on a last-minute midwinter “business trip” to Florida, thereby thwarting his plans for revenge. So, with his principal intention thus foiled, the angry customer resorted to his fallback plan, taking the owner’s son, Richard (Dacre Montgomery), as hostage. And, to show the world he meant business, the perpetrator fitted his captive with a taut wire around his neck that was connected to a shotgun set to fire with the slightest unplanned motion. However, despite his seemingly efficient planning, the determined but somewhat bumbling culprit ended up launching what would turn out to be a cross between a he…

Back in 1977, Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgård) took the law into his own hands by brazenly kidnapping the son of the owner of a mortgage company that he felt had left him high, dry and broke. Now we are not taking about a child here, Richard (Dacre Montgomery) is a married adult and father who is frog-marched out of his building with a shotgun tied to his head. They even pinch a police car to drive to his explosives-riddled apartment where he will hold his hostage until he gets $5 millions in compensation and a written apology from M.L. Hall (Al Pacino) whom he blames for his woes. Meantime, the smooth-tongued local radio personality Fred Temple (Colman Domingo) is trying to keep the city mellow and is surprised when he gets a call from Tony asking him to help mediate. Is there even the slightest chance he can facilitate something that isn’t going to result in someone’s brains all over the linoleum? This is loosely based on real events, but even so Gus Van Sant manages to maintain quite a taut degree of jeopardy as events unfold. Pacino only features in about three scenes and he manages to make quite an impact as a dad nobody would ever want, but it’s really Skarsgård’s film as he really quite likeably treads the thinnest of lines between maniac and avenging angel. Along the way, he benefits from a powerfully earthy script to help him vacillate precariously as he tries to stay on…

Browse discussions about “Dead Man's Wire”

Jump to Reddit for live threads on this title.